리틀팍스

I'll make DOU writing time every day with our society virtually issue for solving mistakes by our society. Well,today's issue debate leitmotif is "Should we provide convenient facilities to street people by Homeless facilities provide rule.".

 Korea enforced "Homeless facilities provide rule" .

Korea made rule about homeless people

 can get benefit what using conveniet facilities to Korea citizen's tax .

That's why some citizens opposed "Homeless facilities provide rule" because of the reasons like

"Why our nation is  squandering citizen's important tax what we worked hardly and laboriously to homeless people?".

Every years, Antithesis provide some convenient facilities to Homeless people and  approval that rule people  debated zealously for changing rule or protect rule about helping Hommless people. 

But some people think "Why Antithesis people didn't support at  Helping homeless people rule?" and they always insistenced

'Rule is right' and they tried to protect and  defend intact rule for poors or street people.

Then I think, we should help Homeless people.

1. 
   
   Because they took poor life because they didn't have abilities and competence what need for earning money a lot or less.


2. 
   
   Another reason of I antithesised at intact rule is because of when we didn't help them,


3. 
   
   maybe they are die for do not have competence for earning money.


4. 
   
   When we didn't help them, they may be change to thief or robber and that misakes going to killing and  taking another's money or some objects because of one feather, "They don't have money".